Ciencias
terça-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2016
terça-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2016
Geologic time.
domingo, 6 de novembro de 2016
- The formation of The Sun, Earth and Moon -
So, a very long time ago (about 5 billion years) in a perfectly normal and ordinary place in the galaxy, a supernova exploded, pushing a lot of its heavy wreckage into a nearby cloud of hydrogen gas and interstellar dust.
The mixture grew hot and compressed under its own gravity, and at its center a new star began to form. Around it swirled a disk of the same material, which grew white-hot from the power of the great forces. That new star became what is now our Sun, and the glowing disk gave rise to Earth and other planets close by. We can see things just like this happening other places in the universe. While the Sun's size and energy grew, beginning to ignite its nuclear fires, the hot disk slowly got colder. This action was extremely slow, lasting millions of years.
At some point during this time, the Sun ignited. Even though the Sun was not as bright as it is today, the process of ignition had the energy it needed to blow away most of the gaseous part of its surface.The chunks and other stuff that was left behind continued to collect into a handful of large, stable bodies, sort of like planets. Earth was the result of the third one of these. We know that the process of accumulation was violent and spectacular, because the smaller pieces left huge visible marks marks on the larger ones. This happened about 4,6 billion years ago.
It took another hundred million years before what is now our moon appeared. There are 3 main theories as to how our moon could have gotten created, so we can not really be sure.
The first one of these theories (Giant impact hypothesis) is that a mars-sized body (given the name Theia) collided with Earth, throwing chunks and bits from Earth (which was a young planet at the time). Gravity then kind of glued these particles together, creating what is know as our moon. This sort of formation would explain why the moon is made up mainly by lighter elements, making it less dense than Earth.
The second theory (Co-formation theory) explains that moons can also form at the same time as their parent planet. With this theory, gravity would have caused material in the early solar system to draw together at the same time as gravity bound particles together to form Earth. Such a moon would have a very similar composition to the planet, and would explain the moon's location as to where is it today. But this theory doesn't sound right because the moon is less dense than earth, which likely wouldn't happen if they were made at the same time with the same elements.
And, the third and last theory (the capture theory) says that perhaps Earth's gravity bumped into a body that was just passing by. This has also happened with other moons in the solar system. Under the capture theory, a rocky body formed elsewhere in the solar system could have been drawn into orbit around the Earth. The capture theory would explain the differences in the composition of the Earth and the moon. However, such orbiters are often oddly shaped, and do not have the circle-like shaped body like the moon, so this theory doesn't really make the sense it should make.
Personally, I think theory number one - the Giant impact hypothesis - sounds the most accurate, but you can decide whichever one you believe in!
-Gabriela
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)